What Kind of Medicine Can You Give a 7 Month Old Baby

You know about how individuals gain control of the ability of the Land and and then abuse that ability like quondam Usa President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Call back how Bush was supported by Uk Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the Usa with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'southward weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed within xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous recall that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade united states we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save usa all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this mean solar day.

On CHS we wrote previously virtually how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of 3 completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly diet and sanitation. The event cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to take:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

At that place was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was peculiarly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading illness: London's first park built afterward rich feared affliction spread from slums Uk The Independent By Andy McSmith Fri 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Earth.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would go along them safe from the threat of illness.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could attain this past ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the affliction controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did non work and sometimes killed as many or more than than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" nonetheless contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, U.k., USA, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Dr. – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- United kingdom, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Whatever vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Urban center of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the Uk and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [meet table below].  Leicester's approach besides cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book every bit .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Minor-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Nippon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.eight
British Regular army (Uk)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.one
British Ground forces (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	eight.viii
Royal Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	viii.0
Grand Totals and example fatality charge per unit per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	i,206	61	v.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Imperial Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a respective result—but on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Toll of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	ix,659	one,594	xvi.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	ix.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	xxx	four.x	£1,602

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu flavour and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you lot might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious affliction brainstorm?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same bones tale of the brilliant observation of a unproblematic country doctor and his backbone in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was frequently called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year old boy named James Phipps to exam his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'south hands. The boy came downwards with a slight fever, but cipher more. After, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, instance of the illness. Aught happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; again, nothing. [i]

Edward Jenner's thought eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. Information technology was originally referred to as cowpoxing, only eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the globe would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Just legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, accomplish an iconic condition while whatsoever unsavory aspects well-nigh the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching information technology into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the do of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea backside inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would exercise ameliorate against the disease than if they contracted it at some perhaps less desirable time and identify in the futurity.

The idea was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could but be afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often aid protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was yet an estimated 2-v% that died as a outcome.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a twenty-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Merely, was the departure in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it have had something to exercise with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more than nutritious food and a cleaner surroundings than the bulk of club?

There was i major and more often than not unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than in that location would have been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years afterwards, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious disease, what tends to cease the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increase that danger; the do of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious illness is produced by Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise take been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a middle where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are apparently multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

Still, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

At present enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, assertive these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-onetime boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox equally a test to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

Simply he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where pocket-size-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [eight]

From the kickoff there were problems with Jenner'southward procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[ix]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early on reports indicated that in that location were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were still dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-pox matter without event, and a few months later took confluent small-pox and died. ii. A woman-servant to Mr. Adventure, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. 7 years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted pocket-sized-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator'due south name was concealed. xiv. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south office . . . died of small-pox a year subsequently vaccination.[ten]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was non living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of pocket-size-pox later vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality charge per unit and is essentially the same fatality charge per unit as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical process.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination by the nearly skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly keen.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Merely subsequently vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His feel was that, subsequently vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the fourth dimension were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace it as a new form of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a md to have spoken out against information technology as Dr. Dark-brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, ane, and, 2 [1820-1822] at that place was a great hubbub about the small-pox. It broke out with the groovy epidemic to the north . . . Information technology pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and often severely; nearly to decease; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some lone, but fell upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical do. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox later, and accept either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine textile was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, only as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh material direct from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine fabric came from cows, Jenner really believed the material originated from an infectious status of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, at that place were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was but smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would effect in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that moo-cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[xix] A later inquiry determined that this was zero more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were besides reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a specially prolonged and painful style to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-boondocks, anile 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the historic period of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two practiced cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, anile 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas later vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

Outset I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. Merely facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis past ways of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I practice non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In society to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did cypher to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the dandy 1872 epidemic. After 1855, in that location were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-sixty, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the nigh astringent smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the xx years subsequently the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were and so made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out confronting the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the strength of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators take received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they volition get most a quarter 1000000. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a dishonest remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were 20-three grand four hundred and sixty-ix cases of pocket-size-pox in that ground forces. The London Lancet of July fifteen, 1871 said:

Of ix thousand three hundred and xc-two small-scale-pox patients in London hospitals, six chiliad viii hundred and 50-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than 1 hundred and xx-2 thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany evidence that betwixt 1870 and 1885 one meg vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal freedom and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the authorities and chose to pay fines. Some fifty-fifty accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the groovy sit-in in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned yr Leicester's regime, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new regime that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to x%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and constructive means that eliminated the need for vaccination. Yet, there were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," peculiarly in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Depression vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[thirty] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an heart-sore to the pro-vaccinists the earth over. Here is a bang-up manufacturing boondocks having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated past a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted every bit a safe process, it often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph four).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph three: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the finish of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. Afterwards the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that simply killed anywhere from 1 in l and later to equally low as 1 in 380. The disease could still impale, but having go so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the Southward and later gradually spread over the land. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was commonly at first mistaken for craven pox. . .[32]

The writer of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around 20%, equally information technology had been historically. The table likewise showed that after 1896 the death rate roughshod off quickly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as depression equally 0.26% by 1908. As the mild course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be hard to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this fourth dimension, considered a balmy illness of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important because it often gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of balmy smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced trivial in the mode of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent-minded, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was non a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox decease in the United states of america in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, at present beingness termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this illness was estimated past the authors to be between ane in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of iv to 40%.[35] Still, they best-selling that about cases were non reported and at that place was no accurate bookkeeping on this consequence of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the upshot of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned time in that location had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox expiry in the United States post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, only since that time at that place have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father subsequently the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother as well required treatment and virus was found all over the business firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been fifty-fifty higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a land with a modern health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the entire world?

In that location were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now inappreciably a serious supporter. We are aback to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the blow of some hereafter epidemic might put united states in the wrong. Nosotros adopt to allow compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as well-nigh the just medically promoted mode to deal with disease, at that place were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a multifariousness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, Thou.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit applied to small-scale pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable equally a prophylactic in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while amidst those under ordinary treatment the bloodshed was as usual.[xl]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar'due south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or iv times a 24-hour interval to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Gild, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the neat men who for a century by have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fright of smallpox if he volition take two or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The word may at present be regarded as airtight, and smallpox at concluding is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem dizzy, but only considering most people have been conditioned to accept the age-former prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast's (usually a cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metallic prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of good for you collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and too gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the torso is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar belongings cells together and, every bit a consequence, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'southward Higher, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California dominicus. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amid the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, every bit living nigh entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour fabricated into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed downward with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the near intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Golden Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated x,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Ceremonious War twice equally many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For example, the causes of decease listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a pocket-size fraction. Those who were killed in actual boxing or who died equally a result of their wounds accounted only for ane percent of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (besides known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive turn down of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & half-dozen).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a land doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a primal medical belief that continues to exist echoed past indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows united states of america a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the earth psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of illness matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's corking discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the proper name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more vaccines seem like a good idea to you?

More data on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be constitute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
ane.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, Medico, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Noesis and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
vii."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Admirer's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard'due south Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. 2, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Md-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. xx, 1834, p. 504.
eighteen.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, Medico, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the Usa," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Midweek, Apr 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Pocket-sized-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Scout, April 1911, vol. xix, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. Due west. Harman, Dr., "A Physician's Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, Apr sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
thirty.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non by the Propagation of Affliction," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. W. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. sixteen, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Communicable diseases every bit Shown past the History of Smallpox in the Us," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Correct to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Flim-flam, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
forty."Acetic Acid in Red Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Periodical of Medical Surgical and Germ-free Science, vol. 1, no. one, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, Jan 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, Jan 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Wellness Prophylactic, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

nicolbume2001.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post